Tennessee Injury Lawyer Blog

There are many activities that have been discussed previously on this blog that do not mesh well with driving, such as texting, drinking alcohol, using illegal drugs, and sleeping. One such activity that has been little discussed but is equally as dangerous is grooming or primping while driving. On any given day in a heavy- or medium-traffic area, one is likely to see a multitude of derivatives of this behavior. It is not at all uncommon to see another driver putting on makeup, tweezing his or her eyebrows, styling his or her hair, generally checking his or her appearance etc. In some cases, one may even see another driver performing some routine bikini-line maintenance while her passenger steers the vehicle.

The issue with all of these forms of activity is that when a driver is focused on his or her hair, eyes, lips, eyebrows, or other assorted bodily locations, that driver is not completely focused on the road ahead, which, as luck would have it, is where all of the other vehicles and pedestrians who are using the roadway happen to be. This failure to keep a proper lookout is negligent in Tennessee and can result in an accident for which the negligent driver will be held responsible. Needless to say, the act of grooming or primping while driving is one that causes more than its fair share of accidents on the roadways, especially in high-traffic areas where people tend to perform a good chunk of their morning beautification ritual while in the vehicle on the way to work or school.

There is simply nothing a potential victim of such activity could do to try to avoid the accident, since there is no way to know the man behind you is trying to trim his goatee in the carpool lane until he rear-ends your vehicle. However, victims can recover for their damages by bringing a personal injury suit against the negligent driver, which would enable the victim(s) to recover for the damages and injuries caused by the negligent conduct.

Tennessee imposes many duties on drivers within the state in order to make sure that they are driving in a reasonably safe manner. One such duty is the duty to keep a proper lookout. This duty extends not only to keeping a proper lookout for vehicles and other obstacles in the roadway, but also extends to keeping a lookout for pedestrians as well. Unfortunately many drivers fail to drive in a safe manner in areas where they know or should expect pedestrians to be present. Such places include school zones, college campuses, heavily populated areas, and crosswalks. Failure to keep a proper lookout in these areas can lead to serious injury or even death and is also likely to lead to a personal injury lawsuit in East Tennessee should the driver’s negligent behavior result in injury to the victim.

A memorial service is reportedly being planned for a sixty-four year-old college student at the University of Central Oklahoma who was killed on Tuesday in an automobile-pedestrian accident. The woman apparently took the bus to school on Tuesdays and Thursdays and was stepping out into the street to board the bus on Tuesday morning near her apartment complex when she was struck by a vehicle. Law enforcement officials say it looked like she may have walked into the side of a moving vehicle, and the manager of the apartment complex said she may have gotten her suitcase used to carry her books stuck on something and was trying to get it unstuck as she stepped out into the road. There is no indication in the article of who was at fault for the accident.

The unfortunate truth is that sometimes there is simply nothing a driver can do to avoid accidents, even if he or she is keeping a proper lookout. For this reason, drivers should drive much more slowly and with a much greater degree of caution in areas where they know pedestrians are present just in case something out of the ordinary might happen. Failure to take extra care may result in the driver being liable for the damages should a scenario take place like the one described above.

Source: http://newsok.com/memorial-service-planned-for-uco-student-killed-in-auto-pedestrian-accident/article/3443570

Authorities are now releasing details of a bus crash in Florida that was responsible for the deaths of two people on board the bus. They say an eighty-one year old woman who was driving her car failed to yield and struck the bus on its side. The bus was carrying senior citizens who were on a cultural tour, and there were reportedly thirty-two people on board at the time of the crash. The collision caused the bus to run off the road, roll over twice, and eject some of its passengers. It took the efforts of several emergency response crews to attempt to treat everyone who was at the scene. The driver was not as unfortunate as most of the bus passengers, as she sustained only minor injuries as a result of the crash.

This situation demonstrates how dangerous failure to yield can be on the roadways. Wherever a driver sees a “yield” sign on the road, he or she must wait until no oncoming traffic would be affected by that driver entering traffic before making the decision to enter the roadway. While it is common to see drivers treat a “yield” sign in a similar manner to a stop sign, that is not a correct interpretation of the rule of the road requiring drivers to yield. Yielding has nothing to do with stopping or even slowing down your vehicle, but rather implies that a driver defer to all oncoming traffic before deciding to entering the road.

As seen above, the failure to yield can cause serious accidents and may very well result in a significant amount of liability being placed on the offending driver, who will likely be responsible for any damages and injuries (including, in this case, wrongful death or some similar claim) sustained by any victims should the decision not to yield cause an auto accident. Drivers should always be wary of yield signs and make sure the way is clear before they decide to enter the roadway.

Source: http://news.findlaw.com/ap/other/1110/02-23-2010/20100223052007_13.html

A Sevierville, Tennessee woman is making national headlines after she went in front of an investigative panel of the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Tuesday to testify about the harrowing ordeal she underwent when her Lexus suddenly accelerated to speeds of over one hundred miles per hour. The woman tried everything she could think of (hitting the brakes, putting the car in neutral, reverse, etc.) to no avail before the vehicle miraculously slowed down, enabling her to avoid a car crash in Sevierville.

Incidents like this one have cause Toyota to millions of vehicles around the country. Toyota initially blamed the acceleration problems on sticking gas pedals and misplaced floor mats, but the House subcommittee is investigating whether or not the acceleration issues could be the result of an electronic malfunction that Toyota initially refused to acknowledge in instituting the recalls. Toyota does admit that the company may have grown too fast to enable them to maintain the proper focus on consumer safety but the company denies that there are any electronic problems of the sort alleged by the House subcommittee.

Continue reading "Tennessee Woman Tells Congress About Her Toyota Troubles" »

Employing the service of a designated driver is one of the most responsible actions that can be taken by a person who is unfit to drive. However, it is essential to make sure that your designated driver is someone who is actually capable of legally operating a vehicle and is also someone who is not intoxicated as well. Such was the lesson learned by a Texas man last week when he decided to let his niece drive him home because he was intoxicated.

Unfortunately his niece was only fourteen years old, and was also reportedly intoxicated. Officers initiated a traffic stop on the vehicle and the vehicle drove into the yard of a nearby home while trying to stop near the curb. Both the uncle and the driver face a litany of charges.

Designating a driver is a great way to avoid irresponsible driving behavior and potential liability in a lawsuit arising from an auto accident. However, that driver must legally be able to drive and must be in a condition to operate a motor vehicle. Tennessee drivers who employ the tactic described above will be responsible for the damages suffered by any victims in a personal injury suit just as they would if they had actually driven the vehicle while under the influence.

Continue reading "Drunk Uncle Uses Teen, Also Drunk, as Designated Driver" »

Twenty-seven unlucky people at an auto auction in Ellijay, Georgia got more than they bargained for at a car auction on Tuesday night when a Volvo that was being driven into the building to be auctioned off suddenly accelerated and plowed through the crowd, injuring a host of spectators. Fourteen of the auction-goers had to be taken to the hospital as a result of the incident and thirteen more were treated on the scene. Authorities reportedly believe the crash to be an accident, although no specific cause has yet been revealed.

The biggest risk most people expect to face when attending an auction is that someone across the room will be just a little more enthusiastic about buying an item than they are. They certainly don’t expect to get hurt, and only in their wildest dreams would attendees consider the possibility that a rogue vehicle would do its best Horace the Hate Bug impression and mow down the crowd. However, this kind of scenario is one which Tennessee law sometimes expects the persons or companies that host the auctions to consider. Tennessee law demands that an owner or occupier of a space use reasonable care to prevent harm to the patrons, visitors, or other persons who could foreseeably be on the property. Failure to do so may be negligent, and may expose the owner or occupier to premises liability for the damages or injuries sustained should something like the above scenario occur.

Continue reading "Auto Auction Disaster Injures Dozens" »

As technology has advanced, drivers have found an increasing number of ways to distract themselves while attempting to travel America’s roadways. One of the latest examples comes from Illinois where a man rear-ended the squad car of an Illinois State Trooper who had just pulled onto Interstate 80 from the median. The man, who was reportedly speeding at the time of the incident, was trying to change the ringtone on his mobile phone, which caused him to divert his attention from the road and made him unable to spot the trooper in time.

Luckily no one was injured in the collision, which occurred just days before a new law prohibiting Illinois drivers from using electronic devices while driving was to take effect. To help combat similar incidents in the future, Illinois police have placed the car in the median with a sign that informs passers-by that the car was struck while texting.

This scenario is becoming ever more likely as distracted driving has become the leading cause of roadway accidents. Public service announcements in Tennessee are now citing that distracted driving accounts for 80% of all roadway accidents, meaning that if you are the victim of an auto accident in Tennessee then there is a good chance that the party at-fault was engaged in some fort of distracted driving at the time the accident occurred.

Continue reading "Man Rear-Ends Squad Car While Trying To Change Ringtone" »

Intoxication often leads individuals to make less than optimal decisions, which is exactly what an Indiana man did early Sunday morning when he decided it might be a good idea to try to steal a backhoe. The man apparently climbed over a fence to get to the backhoe and then crashed the backhoe through the fence to make his escape. A host of witnesses reportedly saw the man try to make his escape and called the police, with one even following him down the highway while talking to police on his mobile phone. To make matters worse for the man, he reportedly attempted to make his escape by zig-zagging between his own lane and oncoming traffic on the backhoe. Police said he showed signs of intoxication. The criminal consequences of this situation are discussed here.

As is often discussed on this blog, operating a vehicle while intoxicated is a frequent source of negligent driving that can result in liability in personal injury lawsuits. In this scenario, the driver made several unfortunate decisions, all of which constitute negligence in Tennessee. The first such decision was driving a backhoe down the highway, since the highway probably isn’t a proper or safe place to drive such a low-speed vehicle. The second poor decision was the decision to try to evade the police, since other drivers can easily be injured in a police chase and the driver who is the cause of the chase can be held responsible for the damages. The third unfortunate decision in this case was the decision to weave between the proper lane of travel and oncoming traffic. This decision, maybe more than any other, could result in the driver or someone else being seriously injured or killed. This decision could also constitute conduct that a jury could find was reckless enough to warrant the imposition of punitive damages.

Driving while intoxicated is never a good idea, and newspapers and websites are filled with examples of why that is the case. That decision often leads to serious accidents and personal injury suits, which often result in large damages awards against the person responsible for the accident.

Source: http://www.azcentral.com/offbeat/articles/2010/02/09/20100209man-flees-in-backhoe.html

While some schools are extremely strict on their tardy policies, forcing students to get to class on time no matter what, that is probably not what caused a seventeen year-old boy from Shoreline, Washington to crash his parents’ car through the doors of his high school and drive it down the hall. The car reportedly traveled about seventy-five yards before coming to a stop after hitting a security office. The police say drugs and alcohol were not involved, but the teen was taken for a mental evaluation. There has been no confirmation yet as to why or how the crash occurred.

Scenarios such as this one help to illustrate why individuals under twenty-five, particularly males, are considered “high-risk” by insurance companies and generally have to pay higher premiums. This high-risk status derives from many factors. First and foremost is the fact that drivers under the age of twenty-five will generally be less experienced behind the wheel than older drivers. Second, younger drivers are also generally more prone to risky or reckless driving, which can combine with inexperience to form a deadly combination. Third, younger drivers are thought by insurance companies to have a lesser degree of emotional maturity than do older drivers, which may cause them to let emotional or stressful situations impact the decisions they make behind the wheel of an automobile. This is also probably the reason that the teen in this situation is being taken for a mental evaluation, which can help determine whether or why he decided to crash the car into the school.

In situations like this one, it is extremely fortuitous when no injuries result. A vehicle crashing through the hallways of a high school would have the potential to injure or kill dozens or hundreds of kids depending on the time of day. Luckily no one was injured in this incident, including the driver, but it does provide a good example of why drivers in this age group may be considered “high-risk” by insurance companies.

Source: http://www.denverpost.com/watercooler/ci_14358948

No matter how clearly the defendant is at fault nor how badly the plaintiff is injured, one factor that always looms ready to completely cutoff the plaintiff’s ability to recover for his or her loss is the statute of limitations. A statute of limitations is basically a statute that prescribes a certain time period (often called the limitations period) during which certain types of lawsuits can be brought or charges can be filed. In the personal injury context, this often depends on the cause of action and the type of damages claimed by the plaintiff. For example, actions for injury to the person must be commenced within one year after the cause of action accrues. In plain English, this means that if a plaintiff is injured by a defendant’s negligence in an automobile accident, that plaintiff has one year from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit. This rule is in place so that potential defendants do not get twenty years down the road and suddenly get slapped with a huge lawsuit from two decades ago. This also helps to keep the facts and evidence fresh in order to achieve the best resolution possible.

As noted above, the statute of limitations can differ depending on the type of claim pursued or the type of damages sought. For example, actions for damage to personal property are given a three year statute of limitations, which stands in stark contrast to actions for personal injury which have a period of limitations that is two years shorter. Finding and abiding by the correct statute of limitations can be frustrating, but failing to do so can cost a plaintiff the ability to recover for his case. A skilled attorney can take on the responsibility of making sure a plaintiff’s claim is brought within the limitations period or possibly even find an exception for a claim that will inevitably be filed too late.

Source: Hixon v. Highsmith, 147 F.Supp. 801 (E.D.Tenn. 1957).

Authorities are still searching for the cause of an automobile accident that occurred in Las Vegas, Nevada earlier this week which involved a Pontiac Vibe crashing into the Edgewater Hotel & Casino, killing two people and injuring eight others. Witnesses reportedly saw the vehicle speed through a red light and down the casino’s driveway at speeds of over sixty miles per hour before running into the casino. The seventy year-old driver of the vehicle said that he fainted before the vehicle crashed into the casino, but investigators are not ruling out mechanical problems with the Vibe as being the cause of the accident. Although the Vibe is a joint venture between Toyota and GM, the potential problems with this vehicle are reportedly not linked to the recent Toyota recalls.

Although authorities have not been able to determine the cause of the accident, their eventual findings will be critical to the victims of the case. The party responsible for the accident will potentially be facing personal injury and product liability claims from ten different parties, which more than likely will consist of a couple of wrongful death suits and numerous claims for medical expenses and damages depending on the circumstances. If the automakers are found liable for a mechanical defect in the vehicle, the victims will have a greater chance of recovering the full amounts of the damages and medical expenses that would potentially be awarded since automakers generally have a greater capacity to compensate victims than does your average seventy year-old man.

Continue reading "Police Searching for Cause of Deadly Casino Crash" »

If there are such things as famous last words that precede an automobile accident, “Hey guys, watch this,” may just be those words. Rarely does such a statement precede a safe and reasonable driving maneuver, as a nineteen year-old Montana woman would probably attest. The woman was escorting three passengers in her SUV while reportedly high on marijuana, speeding, and texting. Surprisingly, these three activities did not combine to see the vehicle’s occupants safely home. The driver was reportedly intentionally causing the vehicle to fishtail when she said “Hey guys, watch this” before losing control of the vehicle which went off the road, through a fence, and rolled four times. Two of her passengers were ejected from the SUV during the wreck and suffered serious injuries while the third suffered less severe, but still substantial, injuries. The driver is also facing criminal charges.

It almost goes without saying that if the driver was engaging in the reported behavior at the time of the accident that she will be liable for the medical expenses and damages incurred by her passengers. Texting, speeding, and driving under the influence are sources of negligent driving in Tennessee; when you combine the three activities it is almost a certainty that the victims will be compensated for their damages by the driver. Behavior such as intentionally causing the vehicle to fishtail is also negligent, and may even be considered reckless by the jury such that it warrants a punitive damages award. The problem with this however, is that the driver is unlikely to be able to pay for the medical expenses alone, much less a tacked-on punitive damages award. This article serves to illustrate the dangers of several different types of negligent driving. Texting while driving, speeding, driving under the influence, and thrill driving are all negligent behaviors that are likely to cause accidents. When all of these factors are present at one time, it is a recipe for disaster.

Source: http://billingsgazette.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/article_b2eca4b2-108b-11df-9d4a-001cc4c03286.html